Vallee’s voice in this deep and searching interview. What he discovered was emotionally powerfu, which you can hear in Dr. He then returned to this man 40 years later and interviewed him again. Vallee investigated the case, he realized that it was one of the most incredible in his experience. Available for streaming now, it’s the story of an Argentinian gaucho who, as a boy, encountered a UFO in a field and simply walked on board.
Jacques Vallee discussing the extraordinary new documentary “Witness of Another World,” made by director Alan Stivelman. The other High Court Judge allegedly involved, Justice Quddusi, has been referred to as "bade vakil sahab" by the co-accused over calls.Īll the accused have denied wrongdoing and were granted bail last week by a lower court.First, we spend half an hour with Dr. Indicating that a bribe could be paid to get a favourable order from Justice Shukla, an accused tells a co-accused in another conversation that Justice Shukla is "not going to become a Supreme Court Judge or Chief Justice". Upon receiving a favourable order, one of the co-accused (a woman) congratulated the co-owner of the medical college telling him "balle balle". "Met Ganesh ji, darshan kar liye, prasaad chara liye (co-accused)", reads conversation. One intercepted call conversation shows that the co-owner of the medical college informed a co-accused that he "touched the feet of Justice Shukla". The charge sheet states that Justice Quddusi took along a co-owner of the medical college to meet Justice Shukla at his residence in Lucknow. In one of the intercepted conversations, a co-accused raised the apprehension that justice Kumar was a "negative" Judge and might deny "relief". The co-accused referred to bribes as "Re 1, quintal and KM (kilometer)". The charge sheet states that these two HC judges were placed under surveillance from August 23, 2017, to September 7, 2017. The CBI has also produced relevant excerpts of 73 intercepted conversations between two accused HC (retd) judges, IM Quddusi of the Odisha HC and Justice Shukla, as well as other accused allegedly discussing bribes. In his testimony to the CBI, Justice Kumar said it was on his suggestion that the HC order read: "On the basis of this order the petitioner (college) shall have no right to claim any admission of the students."Īccording to CBI's charge sheet, "Justice Virendra Kumar-II has no association/connivance with Justice Shukla" in passing the said illegal order in August 2017.
However, Justice Shukla agreed to hear the matter, observing that a HC under Article 226 had the same power as the Supreme Court does under Article 32, according to the CBI charge sheet. He had also observed that since the petitioner college was debarred by the central government/MCI, it cannot remain in the list of colleges that are permitted to participate in counselling. Justice (retd) Kumar had asked the counsel for Prasad Education Trust - whose college the Medical Council of India (MCI) had debarred for substandard facilities - "that when all matters of admission in medical colleges were being examined by the Supreme Court, then why the petition has not been pressed". Justice Kumar is prosecution witness number 12 in the list of 105 witnesses furnished by the federal agency to a special CBI Court in its charge sheet, which ET has reviewed.Īccording to the charge sheet, Justice (retd) Kumar has deposed that he had objected to the listing of a petition filed by the College on August 25, 2017, after it was withdrawn from the Supreme Court and listed before the division bench of the Allahabad HC comprising him and Justice (retd) Shukla.
0 kommentar(er)
